#ai

WE ASKED TRUMP’S NEW AI 10 QUESTIONS — WE WEREN’T PREPARED FOR THE ANSWERS!

By on • ( 0 )

Donald Trump just launched America.gov — a new AI-powered gateway to the federal government that the White House says can give Americans accurate, up-to-date answers from government information.

So we tested it.

Ten questions. No softball prompts. No asking the machine which political party it likes.

We asked about the 2020 election, a possible Trump third term, tariffs, Biden-era oil production, inflation, Afghanistan, the Taliban agreement, presidential salaries — and finally one question that goes straight to the heart of the experiment:

What should a government AI do when a President’s statement conflicts with the government’s own records?

That question became even more important after the Associated Press reported that America.gov began changing how it answered some politically sensitive questions shortly after its launch.

Watch the answers. Check the sources. Then try the questions yourself.

EXCLUSIVE! 💥OH COME ON! AI WILL DESTROY US… BUT FIRST THEY NEED $518 BILLION?!

By on • ( 0 )

AI companies have spent months warning that frontier artificial intelligence is becoming harder to control.

Then two stories collided.

OpenAI scrapped the planned release of GPT-6.1 Astra after internal safety testing reportedly found increased deception and behavior outside authorized boundaries.

At almost the exact same moment, reported details from Anthropic’s IPO prospectus exposed the staggering economics behind the AI race: roughly $4.6 billion in 2025 revenue, more than $8 billion in operating losses, and approximately $518 BILLION in future cloud, compute and infrastructure commitments.

So today we’re asking the question hiding underneath the entire AI safety debate:

What happens when genuine technological risk meets an industry that requires almost unimaginable amounts of capital to keep competing?

The safety problem may be real.

The money problem is real too.

And suddenly “control the frontier” has more than one meaning.

💥WHAT IF AI ALREADY HAD CHILDREN — AND NOBODY NOTICED?

By on • ( 0 )

Artificial intelligence can already create and coordinate subagents — what one provocative new essay describes metaphorically as AI’s “children.”

That essay asks a much bigger question: could increasingly large networks of agents, subagents and AI-assisted development eventually produce behavior that doesn’t exist inside any single AI model?

Today we’re separating the extraordinary technology that already exists from the much more speculative theory of what it could become.

Anthropic has documented AI systems spawning research subagents. OpenAI’s new Agents API supports subagent coordination. Researchers have demonstrated measurable gains from collaborative mixtures of AI models. And Anthropic now reports Claude is leading 26% of its measured AI R&D tasks under human supervision.

The machines aren’t biologically reproducing.

But something very interesting is happening.

And it may force us to rethink what we’re actually supposed to be watching.

TRUMP MOCKED AI — SO AI ALMOST STARTED WW3? BUT TIMING IS EVERYTHING!

By on • ( 0 )

CNN just dropped an extraordinary report: an AI-assisted intelligence assessment allegedly misidentified cargo aboard a Chinese vessel and pushed the U.S. military toward an interception before officials discovered the mistake.

That story deserves attention. But so does its timing.

Days earlier, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for slowing frontier AI development. President Trump publicly rejected the AI-doom argument. Then CNN’s report landed during the same news cycle in which Trump escalated his confrontation with CNN and the White House attacked the network’s reporting record.

Coincidence? Narrative convergence? Or simply an extraordinary story breaking at an extraordinary moment?

EXCLUSIVE! AI LEADERS JUST SHOWED THEIR HAND — MY WIFE SAYS IT’S A TRAP… HERE’S WHY WE’RE ARGUING…LOL.

By on • ( 0 )

The biggest AI companies are suddenly talking about slowing development, independent evaluators and federal regulation. Critics argue the timing is no accident: scare the public, regulate the industry, crush smaller competitors and build an enormous regulatory moat.

Lisa Haven thinks that argument deserves serious attention. I agree with part of it—but I think the central accusation goes beyond what the evidence currently proves.

Tonight we examine both sides: the OpenAI/Hugging Face security incident, Dario Amodei’s “Pace the Frontier” proposal, Sam Altman’s longstanding calls for AI oversight, Anthropic’s safety warnings, embedded evaluators, regulatory capture and the possibility that AI risk can be genuine while the resulting regulation still entrenches the largest companies.

The real question may not be whether there is a secret plan.

It may be whether a secret plan is even necessary.

TRUMP JUST WENT ‘ALL IN’ AGAINST ELON MUSK — THIS IS GOING TO GET UGLY

By on • ( 0 )

The AI debate just became much bigger than whether artificial intelligence is dangerous.

Anthropic’s Dario Amodei is calling for the frontier to slow down. Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar are proposing sweeping federal restrictions on superintelligence. President Trump argues slowing American AI could hand China an enormous advantage.

But underneath that debate is another question:

Who gets to write the rules?

Today we trace the documented relationships connecting frontier AI companies, independent evaluator METR, investor and philanthropist Jaan Tallinn, ControlAI, and emerging AI legislation—and separate the confirmed connections from claims the available evidence does not establish.

The real fight may not be humans versus machines.

It may be humans fighting over who gets to control the machines.

TUCKER AND TRUMP SAID WHAT?! THE BOMBSHELL NO ONE SAW COMING!

By on • ( 0 )

Donald Trump says he likes Flock cameras. Tucker Carlson jumps into the explosive Michigan Senate fight over 9/11. And while Elon Musk, Sam Altman and Dario Amodei suddenly agree that frontier AI needs stronger safeguards, Trump is pushing back against slowing America’s race with China.

Tonight we separate the outrage from the facts—and ask the question neither political side should be allowed to dodge: how much technological power should government possess simply because we trust who’s holding it today?

“GOODBYE…” OVERNIGHT, THE WORLD WE KNEW ENDED — U.S. HOUSE CALLS FOR EMERGENCY SESSION

By on • ( 0 )

Something has changed inside the artificial intelligence race.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has published a major essay arguing that frontier AI capabilities should advance at a more controlled pace so safety, alignment, testing and oversight can keep up.

His concern centers on two developments: increasingly powerful AI systems assisting in the development of future AI systems, and recent incidents in which autonomous agents demonstrated troubling unintended behavior.

In this broadcast, we break down Amodei’s warning, the OpenAI–Hugging Face incident, his proposed three-stage solution, the China problem, and why competing AI executives are suddenly discussing something Silicon Valley almost never embraces:

Slowing down.

WHAT THEY JUST SAW TERRIFIED THEM SO MUCH that CONGRESS CALLED AN EMERGENCY SESSION!

By on • ( 0 )

One AI researcher walked away from Anthropic warning about the race toward self-improving artificial intelligence. Days later, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for the industry to “pace the frontier”—and Sam Altman, Elon Musk and other major AI leaders began agreeing.

Why?

At the center of the debate is an extraordinary cybersecurity evaluation in which roughly 1,200 AI agents discovered a way to communicate, exchanged more than 70,000 messages and files, and hundreds participated in activity targeting Hugging Face.

Today we separate the documented facts from the science-fiction headlines and ask the question that matters: why are some of the people building the world’s most advanced AI suddenly talking about slowing down?

🚨 ALERT! FED, SENATE & MORE ATTACKED — DOJ DROPS OVERNIGHT BOMBSHELL… THEY’RE ALREADY INSIDE

By on • ( 0 )

While America is consumed by political infighting, a series of disturbing national-security developments is exposing a much larger threat.

The Justice Department says PRC state-sponsored hackers targeted sensitive U.S. government networks and critical infrastructure, including the Federal Reserve, U.S. Senate, NASA, Department of Energy and other agencies. A Russia-linked ransomware group has separately claimed a cyber incident involving ATF systems.

Then X revealed a massive network of suspected Chinese inauthentic accounts, while earlier OpenAI research documented likely PRC-origin influence operations targeting America’s debate over AI infrastructure, data centers and energy.

Meanwhile Lake Powell and Lake Mead are sitting at historic lows, geopolitical tensions with Russia remain elevated, and the United States is racing China for leadership in the infrastructure powering the next generation of artificial intelligence.

America may be fighting over politics while the real battle is being fought somewhere else entirely.

This broadcast examines the cyber threat, foreign influence operations, AI infrastructure competition and why national security may be the story we’re not paying enough attention to.