Welcome back to the podcast where we break down global economics with fewer PhDs and more common sense. Today’s headline? The Trump administration is finally saying what every working American has known for decades: we’ve been getting played on trade.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent went on CNN—yes, that CNN—and calmly wrecked the entire globalist trade narrative in under ten minutes. I would’ve brought popcorn, but I was too busy applauding.
Former President Donald Trump made headlines after stating that “something horrible” was discovered—though he didn’t elaborate. Shortly after, a series of chaotic events unfolded in Washington, D.C.:
The fight against President Trump’s America First agenda has never been more aggressive. From the halls of Congress to corporate boardrooms, from radical activists to entrenched bureaucrats, the resistance is working overtime to dismantle the movement that prioritizes American sovereignty, economic prosperity, and national security.
Welcome back to the channel. In today’s video, we’re diving into some major global developments that could have long-lasting implications on international relations, security, and economic power dynamics. From the escalating tensions in Taiwan and the rise of Chinese military exercises, to the shifting sands of alliances between Russia and China, and even Iran’s new threats toward strategic military bases—these are turbulent times for global geopolitics. Let’s break down what’s happening, starting with a crucial move by China in international trade.
But here’s the twist: April is shaping up to be a month where everything will come to a head. From fresh intelligence revelations to military escalations and unexpected political shifts, the pieces of this geopolitical puzzle will finally fall into place. Will the U.S. step up its role in the war, or will tensions boil over into a broader global conflict? Could the consequences of these decisions dramatically reshape the future of Europe and the world?
The White House is currently in full-blown panic mode, as the Trump administration grapples with the chaos surrounding the president’s trade tariffs, and Elon Musk’s unexpected probe into Congress members’ wealth has turned up the heat.
All Hell is about to break loose. B-2s go airborne, a Nuclear missile is launched and Trump states “Consequences will be dire”. All just a matter of timing or a massive show of force!? What is breaking loose and what does it spell for the future of the United States of America. We are going to cover all this and much more in just one minute.
In this video, we dive into President Donald Trump’s overnight post about Judge James Boasberg, the Chief Judge of the D.C. District Court, and the allegations of judicial bias and unfairness. Trump is once again expressing frustration about the judicial system, claiming that Boasberg’s involvement in multiple Trump-related cases is not only a statistical anomaly but also a product of deep-rooted bias against him.
In this video, we dive into President Donald Trump’s overnight post about Judge James Boasberg, the Chief Judge of the D.C. District Court, and the allegations of judicial bias and unfairness. Trump is once again expressing frustration about the judicial system, claiming that Boasberg’s involvement in multiple Trump-related cases is not only a statistical anomaly but also a product of deep-rooted bias against him.
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which handles many high-profile cases involving former President Donald Trump, has five foreign-born judges who have played key roles in several controversial cases. These judges were appointed over the past decade by Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, and their backgrounds and rulings have sparked debate. Among them are Judge Tanya Chutkan, born in Jamaica, and Judge Amit Mehta, born in India, who both oversee major legal challenges involving Trump, including civil cases related to the January 6th attack. Other foreign-born judges include Ana Cecilia Reyes, Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali, and Sparkle Sooknanan, each of whom have been involved in decisions that have been perceived as contrary to Trump’s policies, such as blocking executive orders or restoring federal spending.
Justus Knight News 