#AIRegulation

EXCLUSIVE! AI LEADERS JUST SHOWED THEIR HAND — MY WIFE SAYS IT’S A TRAP… HERE’S WHY WE’RE ARGUING…LOL.

By on • ( 0 )

The biggest AI companies are suddenly talking about slowing development, independent evaluators and federal regulation. Critics argue the timing is no accident: scare the public, regulate the industry, crush smaller competitors and build an enormous regulatory moat.

Lisa Haven thinks that argument deserves serious attention. I agree with part of it—but I think the central accusation goes beyond what the evidence currently proves.

Tonight we examine both sides: the OpenAI/Hugging Face security incident, Dario Amodei’s “Pace the Frontier” proposal, Sam Altman’s longstanding calls for AI oversight, Anthropic’s safety warnings, embedded evaluators, regulatory capture and the possibility that AI risk can be genuine while the resulting regulation still entrenches the largest companies.

The real question may not be whether there is a secret plan.

It may be whether a secret plan is even necessary.

TRUMP JUST WENT ‘ALL IN’ AGAINST ELON MUSK — THIS IS GOING TO GET UGLY

By on • ( 0 )

The AI debate just became much bigger than whether artificial intelligence is dangerous.

Anthropic’s Dario Amodei is calling for the frontier to slow down. Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar are proposing sweeping federal restrictions on superintelligence. President Trump argues slowing American AI could hand China an enormous advantage.

But underneath that debate is another question:

Who gets to write the rules?

Today we trace the documented relationships connecting frontier AI companies, independent evaluator METR, investor and philanthropist Jaan Tallinn, ControlAI, and emerging AI legislation—and separate the confirmed connections from claims the available evidence does not establish.

The real fight may not be humans versus machines.

It may be humans fighting over who gets to control the machines.

🔥 The First AI Candidate Just Entered Congress

By on • ( 0 )

AI super PACs, Alex Bores, New York’s 12th Congressional District, OpenAI-linked investors, Anthropic-linked spending, and the RAISE Act collide in a bizarre congressional race that may reveal how artificial intelligence money plans to influence Congress before Congress regulates AI.

Artificial intelligence didn’t need a robot candidate, a metal skeleton, or a bad sci-fi voice to enter Congress. It just needed super PAC money.

In New York’s 12th Congressional District, a local Democratic primary became a national AI proxy war after candidate Alex Bores helped push New York’s RAISE Act, one of the strongest AI safety laws in the country. According to major reporting, AI-linked political groups poured millions into the race, with one side opposing Bores and another side boosting him.

So is this just one strange Manhattan election — or the first beta test for how AI money captures Washington before Washington ever regulates AI?

This is not left versus right. This is machine money, political influence, congressional power, and the future of who writes the rules.

NO VIEWS! – The Law The Can End YouTube As We Know It! Trump’s Plan Could Quietly Kill Your Channel

By on • ( 0 )

A major AI framework released by Senator Marsha Blackburn could reshape the future of the internet, including potential changes to Section 230—the law that protects platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Rumble from liability over user content.

In this video, we break down what Section 230 actually does, how AI regulation could expand platform liability, and why this could fundamentally alter the creator economy. From algorithm suppression to monetization risks, this may not be a shutdown—but something far more subtle and impactful.

If you are a content creator, influencer, or digital entrepreneur, this is a conversation you cannot afford to ignore.